{"id":"W2529153592","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2016.1083","title":"Institutional Equivalence: How Industry and Community Peers Influence Corporate Philanthropy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Pennsylvania; University of Southern California","keywords":"Institutional theory; Equivalence (formal languages); Functional equivalence; Organizational theory; Peer effects; Public relations; Business; Field (mathematics); Institutional logic; Sociology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Management; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006533123,0.0001220859,0.00009329512,0.000227911,0.002047825,0.0004902665,0.0004214645,0.00005291535,0.0003163556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001992775,0.00008853142,0.000007479156,0.002590572,0.001264685,0.003542643,0.0006416811,0.0001447989,0.0001393264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005627869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007162185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004490039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001539882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989228,0.00001374746,0.0001287868,0.0002398297,0.0004876416,0.0002071557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986767,0.00004249655,0.0002064335,0.0001799838,0.0008719478,0.00002241223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002635137,0.00003488422,0.8484483,0.00003547591,0.000005701098,0.000001816272,0.00007741756,0.00002956523,0.01487423,0.1342,0.001504018,0.0007858998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004080141,0.000009466342,0.9828412,0.00007274887,0.00001859208,0.000004079015,0.0005075074,0.0001100707,0.002079563,0.006736284,0.006923092,0.0002893984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833524,0.0000167811,0.005706016,0.007395634,0.0002133057,0.000123873,0.000003451513,0.0001356681,0.003052823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997885,0.00003352583,0.0001592863,0.001180474,0.0001671104,0.000002104497,0.000007871436,0.00001055498,0.0005540729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1343928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03988845263447098,"score_gpt":0.2390831382005738,"score_spread":0.1991946855661028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}