{"id":"W2529153592","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2016.1083","title":"Institutional Equivalence: How Industry and Community Peers Influence Corporate Philanthropy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Pennsylvania; University of Southern California","keywords":"Institutional theory; Equivalence (formal languages); Functional equivalence; Organizational theory; Peer effects; Public relations; Business; Field (mathematics); Institutional logic; Sociology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Management; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002805771,0.0001234433,0.0002170335,0.001368624,0.001243303,0.002489867,0.0005295333,0.0004863747,0.003685819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01609485,0.000110041,0.00009356969,0.0008176074,0.002661564,0.002232458,0.003666146,0.0004708668,0.000198346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001114865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007411922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00591649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007340359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968796,0.001831005,0.00009603531,0.0003270631,0.0003617393,0.0005045821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845926,0.00606985,0.004872199,0.001199532,0.00105079,0.002214931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000346914,0.0003905411,0.891147,0.00006098005,0.00008423725,0.0007610517,0.02944616,0.001104059,0.003479915,0.009963433,0.0005089195,0.06270674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001827764,0.0002275163,0.9608105,0.00003818204,0.00003349836,0.0001874131,0.02757618,0.001036972,0.0007787564,0.005329296,0.003938259,0.00002516853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918919,0.00009391883,0.0005428195,0.0003657339,0.000004657931,0.000009120752,0.00001363038,0.000004800778,0.007073509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997491,0.00001416409,0.00004872545,0.00001397399,0.000002661884,0.000001042562,0.000004713568,8.360889e-7,0.0001647892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00591649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01483852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03988845263447098,"score_gpt":0.2390831382005738,"score_spread":0.1991946855661028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}