{"id":"W2529336724","doi":"10.1111/conl.12312","title":"Looking Beyond the Fenceline: Assessing Protection Gaps for the World's Rivers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Australian Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Upstream (networking); Marine protected area; Biodiversity; Geography; Drainage basin; Hydrography; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Marine biodiversity; Environmental protection; Ecology; Habitat; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003455698,0.0003490437,0.000357889,0.003546573,0.0007266884,0.001750311,0.000684746,0.000564478,0.001099985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01046998,0.0001229623,0.0003669817,0.004984348,0.001108645,0.003563845,0.00215395,0.0006317607,0.00008929576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009960562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001111082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0144242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02055306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987632,0.0004898716,0.0001017338,0.0002574195,0.000248279,0.0001396103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918621,0.003227689,0.002592141,0.0005772894,0.001269357,0.0004713903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006187098,0.00004193081,0.9605622,0.00006780968,0.0001050426,0.000112827,0.002252722,0.007196405,0.00023796,0.002474563,0.0008069578,0.02607966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004148762,0.00009960516,0.9654765,0.0001296821,0.00004338987,0.0001417789,0.006882273,0.01837501,0.0003803613,0.005279749,0.003162994,0.00002455939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913319,0.0002373025,0.003050135,0.0002708149,0.000006899256,0.00001837224,0.0007052089,0.0000203996,0.004358957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985458,0.00003058554,0.001050763,0.00001665719,0.000002844828,0.00001214646,0.0002634938,0.000004063122,0.00007363305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0286805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01814167334218025,"score_gpt":0.2351496534010688,"score_spread":0.2170079800588886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}