{"id":"W2529484772","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2017.09.002","title":"Forest land value and rotation with an alternative land use","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Rotation (mathematics); Land value; Function (biology); Constant (computer programming); Tree (set theory); Land use; Mathematics; Agroforestry; Economics; Computer science; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Statistics; Combinatorics; Geometry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003437315,0.0002089977,0.0003002755,0.0001012664,0.0001183904,0.0004568963,0.0004280782,0.0001076703,0.00007905878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000313383,0.0001660408,0.00006844715,0.00001493583,0.000191784,0.001056264,0.0003646944,0.0003163532,0.00003138752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001577972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004041265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00406998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009799932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990911,0.00003314063,0.0003411665,0.0002314039,0.0001216782,0.000181487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983181,0.00004436008,0.001113849,0.0003417299,0.00002097105,0.0001609866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000133748,0.00002923191,0.8178893,0.00003997936,0.00005790923,0.00002006416,0.000257826,0.179569,3.178819e-7,0.0007683726,0.0003910888,0.0008432264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009520917,0.0005115983,0.929279,0.0002152218,0.0001120121,0.00007192716,0.00001225712,0.03871929,0.000006201682,0.02166111,0.008123616,0.0003356859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957187,0.00002754166,0.0001404346,0.0002346279,0.0002999635,0.0001961902,0.0000217366,0.000005435586,0.003355376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946057,0.0009551937,0.002967961,0.0001200126,0.0004978101,0.000004549561,0.00002818758,0.00003054529,0.0007901047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1408497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6770946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02277319866739666,"score_gpt":0.2510576563490637,"score_spread":0.2282844576816671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}