{"id":"W2529601681","doi":"10.11646/phytotaxa.278.1.10","title":"Rediscovery, considerations about type locality and conservation of Rhipsalis agudoensis (Cactaceae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phytotaxa","topic":"Botanical Research and Applications","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro","keywords":"Biology; Atlantic forest; Type locality; Subtropics; Biodiversity; Flora (microbiology); Ecology; Botany; Taxonomy (biology)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001527771,0.00006911669,0.0001074526,0.000002491281,0.0001804284,0.00005130997,0.0001014379,0.00004483465,0.0003037861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007218391,0.00001965752,0.00003749382,0.0001449424,0.0002416983,0.0000979391,0.00005383038,0.00005836256,0.00002720483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000964044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000171225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003764712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01251343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992807,0.00007709511,0.0001691729,0.0001759989,0.0001516569,0.0001453779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978639,0.001763471,0.00007644072,0.00009599812,0.0001224841,0.00007768794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008167407,0.0001122117,0.5125796,0.000007162358,0.00004696351,0.0000014352,0.00004791952,8.113486e-7,0.4044044,0.02172932,0.02571865,0.03526991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001218223,0.00006056325,0.9530261,0.00003379545,0.00001139093,0.000001272353,0.00004006573,0.00005024235,0.002351003,0.02693701,0.01729364,0.00007312863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600521,0.0001092859,0.00004164627,0.03912603,0.00002491574,0.0001729232,0.000207129,0.00001767676,0.0002482808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990384,0.0002035522,0.00005595304,0.000479583,0.0001126535,0.00001224285,0.00003481999,7.083682e-7,0.0000620753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4404465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.698279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03297161969337344,"score_gpt":0.253988283099106,"score_spread":0.2210166634057326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}