{"id":"W2529871575","doi":"10.1080/02755947.2016.1214647","title":"Using Scenarios to Assess Possible Future Impacts of Invasive Species in the Laurentian Great Lakes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; University of Minnesota Duluth; Ministry of Natural Resources; Great Lakes Fishery Commission","keywords":"Invasive species; Threatened species; Recreation; Range (aeronautics); Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Expert elicitation; Fishing; Fishery; Ecology; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Biology; Habitat; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01460351,0.001396154,0.0003326598,0.002418509,0.001334974,0.002459316,0.001391957,0.001389316,0.004046523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02839351,0.0004730014,0.0009885206,0.001101422,0.001124783,0.002193118,0.002237242,0.001418721,0.0002037605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004195226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002535227,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01101088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02435534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922479,0.006544181,0.0001733314,0.0002491762,0.0005059973,0.0002793834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682566,0.02628294,0.001767371,0.0007690848,0.002002307,0.0009217109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004134903,0.0002717273,0.02146502,0.0002181111,0.0002605002,0.0006578974,0.001403573,0.946196,0.001301005,0.01104681,0.00161643,0.01514957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001830056,0.0006727011,0.01230347,0.0004337825,0.000214287,0.000113108,0.003425407,0.9307979,0.00319333,0.03990767,0.008574433,0.0001808162],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987343,0.0003910761,0.06196019,0.002247013,0.000063098,0.001595097,0.001392202,0.0002248097,0.03339219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645495,0.0001980618,0.03353567,0.000129424,0.00001325863,0.0004851178,0.0005628627,0.00001392493,0.000512292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01460351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07723165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02718261513881288,"score_gpt":0.2460331738910144,"score_spread":0.2188505587522015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}