{"id":"W2530043799","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.043","title":"Can isolated and riparian wetlands mitigate the impact of climate change on watershed hydrology? A case study approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Watershed; Environmental science; Riparian zone; Hydrology (agriculture); Climate change; Flood myth; Current (fluid); Hydrography; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Geology; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002232763,0.0003998627,0.0003647743,0.0009827371,0.0016374,0.001967529,0.001153696,0.002157995,0.00218148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003974291,0.0001871971,0.0006424204,0.001448846,0.001497206,0.001735386,0.001543374,0.0006444471,0.000112253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001951124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002992052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01680936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05970764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985331,0.0009627129,0.0000277892,0.00007347625,0.0001285512,0.0002744116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972107,0.001795667,0.000297883,0.0001731537,0.0002403173,0.0002822767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002650719,0.0123245,0.2964859,0.001368999,0.001129931,0.03561587,0.01194785,0.1424339,0.01633443,0.1950957,0.01354311,0.2710691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001700124,0.01210484,0.3354388,0.0009574348,0.002146625,0.008755208,0.1361719,0.2651325,0.02251359,0.1257738,0.08889162,0.0004133926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603099,0.0005062226,0.007514711,0.003482638,0.00006306134,0.0003434703,0.0001944124,0.00004514323,0.0275404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922224,0.0004033012,0.005596659,0.0001719476,0.00002356375,0.00006749288,0.00003212349,0.000007299109,0.00147526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01680936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03342301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01263082969885745,"score_gpt":0.2269540696840927,"score_spread":0.2143232399852352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}