{"id":"W2530043799","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.043","title":"Can isolated and riparian wetlands mitigate the impact of climate change on watershed hydrology? A case study approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Watershed; Environmental science; Riparian zone; Hydrology (agriculture); Climate change; Flood myth; Current (fluid); Hydrography; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Geology; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006963051,0.0002486698,0.000322867,0.0001105745,0.000219748,0.00001415084,0.0002602914,0.00004823877,0.000413624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003390285,0.0001176636,0.0001334808,0.00008383842,0.0004172635,0.0001809049,0.0005824835,0.0001345461,0.00004109029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001710808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.571929e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000133832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002684714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984192,0.0001987866,0.000447152,0.0002811616,0.0002827672,0.0003709726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999213,0.00004121869,0.0003533984,0.0002895555,0.000001844979,0.0001009672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001434468,0.003170174,0.9330382,0.00003601034,0.002163264,0.004312443,0.006950524,0.0009979303,0.001170176,0.0000384975,0.0006904759,0.04599785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006003035,0.007776235,0.9774965,0.00004700206,0.0006385143,0.001216103,0.005030461,0.0004972229,0.00008965043,0.0003569018,0.0004495756,0.0003987745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955328,0.00003034117,0.00002433021,0.0009986218,0.00005206898,0.0006684859,0.00001475075,0.000007136865,0.002671485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989189,0.0005483062,0.00005152906,0.0001557586,0.00003312276,0.00003220825,0.000001137348,0.00001583733,0.000243218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04559907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4798182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01263082969885745,"score_gpt":0.2269540696840927,"score_spread":0.2143232399852352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}