{"id":"W2530609185","doi":"10.3138/cbmh.33.2.162-26062015","title":"The Curious Case of Thalidomide and the Absent Eugenic Clause in Canada's Amended Abortion Law of 1969","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Health History","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Eugenics; Abortion; Law; Commonwealth; Thalidomide; Political science; Nonconformity; Politics; Abortion law; Sociology; Medicine; Family planning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003116768,0.0001902324,0.0003266908,0.0006448777,0.02344231,0.00596588,0.001472049,0.007338407,0.001496467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007624359,0.0002953398,0.0003634783,0.000948113,0.02062299,0.001469829,0.001966246,0.01008416,0.0001164347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1327538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9848333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945867,0.000635048,0.0001104746,0.0004113073,0.00254746,0.001709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969833,0.001375912,0.0001820337,0.0001053806,0.0009189795,0.0004343495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004404211,0.00001093889,0.001363406,0.00005378848,0.000008563657,0.0007489441,0.02168152,0.0002771553,0.0006407127,0.9236456,0.03790409,0.0136213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004211253,0.00002883877,0.005354353,0.0003916659,0.00005265182,0.0003951721,0.01072468,0.0003946191,0.0009327303,0.04097207,0.9406149,0.00009631045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1119613,0.03756477,0.002437287,0.5410731,0.00278841,0.00006273563,0.0002541732,0.00005844549,0.3037999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8123482,0.008780487,0.001203161,0.116186,0.0006248515,0.00002270315,0.00005169659,0.00002936171,0.06075347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7677957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01414954583683996,"score_gpt":0.2313765210391521,"score_spread":0.2172269752023121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}