{"id":"W2531017582","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2015.07.376","title":"CLINICAL OUTCOMES ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOSCOPIC RADIAL ARTERY HARVEST: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND SELECTIVE META-ANALYSIS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Meta-analysis; Radial artery; MEDLINE; Relative risk; Statistical significance; Incidence (geometry); Surgery; Confidence interval; Clinical significance; Study heterogeneity; Prospective cohort study; Forest plot; Systematic review; Internal medicine; Artery","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005840935,0.002314522,0.01190895,0.003004406,0.0005628064,0.0025793,0.001830061,0.002044958,0.004526824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01680654,0.001419989,0.02832568,0.004828335,0.0007691031,0.001616761,0.0017023,0.001956927,0.0003914904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001244457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001940009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004757497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01806077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949469,0.001454014,0.002052114,0.0008066808,0.0004757415,0.0002645775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900094,0.00639458,0.002411012,0.0004200136,0.0006149388,0.0001499823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002827101,0.00004146533,0.0125082,0.2337218,0.7401096,0.0002224914,0.0001320173,0.0002507911,0.0002974201,0.0000940517,0.0006596681,0.009135321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005389978,0.0001335079,0.006106786,0.00681244,0.9850348,0.0001160863,0.00006693244,0.00007174437,0.00005840029,0.0001111794,0.0009228454,0.00002619335],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01350849,0.9848681,0.0004315218,0.0001316078,0.0001485581,0.0001109228,0.0005573894,0.00001784651,0.0002255779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3817624,0.6121787,0.002153637,0.001564085,0.0003530335,0.0003995764,0.0009761929,0.00004450323,0.0005678032],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01190895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03089023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1112260335017492,"score_gpt":0.3676798081232642,"score_spread":0.256453774621515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}