{"id":"W2531143669","doi":"10.1016/j.apm.2016.10.001","title":"On modeling beam-rigid-body microgyroscopes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mathematical Modelling","topic":"Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rigid body; Beam (structure); Cantilever; Discretization; Gyroscope; Vibration; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Bending; Physics; Hamilton's principle; Normal mode; Mechanics; Classical mechanics; Structural engineering; Control theory (sociology); Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Acoustics; Computer science; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004457418,0.0007375277,0.000687552,0.0004912168,0.0004739241,0.0009679921,0.0010777,0.001843681,0.002852598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00136224,0.0004665503,0.0008386988,0.000450514,0.0009870162,0.001120323,0.001169753,0.0007231589,0.0009136217],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005002164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006161639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005530361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00389686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997678,0.00007461845,0.00001196015,0.00004026404,0.00008375316,0.00002153989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996628,0.0001505246,0.00005948135,0.00004956836,0.00006074685,0.00001690667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103138,0.00001034241,0.000248317,0.00006178918,0.00001436586,0.00006053919,0.0000916411,0.9550349,0.002515586,0.03634615,0.0002380515,0.005368045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000146563,0.000006191327,0.00006388851,0.000004385638,0.000002276867,0.00001051074,0.000009345906,0.9954271,0.0002764405,0.003391847,0.0008030697,0.000003415652],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01861564,0.000445914,0.9667233,0.0002415475,0.00007708711,0.00005789857,0.000123421,0.000234738,0.01348036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7923247,0.002058739,0.1733721,0.000282603,0.0001253296,0.0004149018,0.0003098525,0.0003120243,0.03079974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005530361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01099634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01679095084159888,"score_gpt":0.215461561596106,"score_spread":0.1986706107545072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}