{"id":"W2531477340","doi":"10.1002/ecy.1591","title":"Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta‐analyses: its magnitude and implications","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":298,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Research Council; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Meta-regression; Study heterogeneity; Ecology; Generality; Variance (accounting); Statistics; Spatial heterogeneity; Sample size determination; Regression analysis; Econometrics; Biology; Mathematics; Psychology; Confidence interval; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3049735,0.003286894,0.008401739,0.01374259,0.001260949,0.007686581,0.005438372,0.00418365,0.002610066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5732625,0.001900575,0.0189639,0.01300184,0.004058254,0.007765142,0.004736266,0.006458993,0.0003250349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003196031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002993293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002334112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003146673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6069561,0.2956591,0.04753582,0.02505725,0.02303391,0.001757847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2585698,0.6865587,0.02488259,0.02204049,0.007068507,0.0008799732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001820454,0.0001288817,0.07576001,0.08437503,0.6031222,0.002597865,0.001960717,0.02494126,0.001714195,0.03962889,0.01941808,0.1445325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001211016,0.001095168,0.05006173,0.06606688,0.4015846,0.002774634,0.001887664,0.06092891,0.004812011,0.3695977,0.03897855,0.001001072],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02743093,0.4743881,0.4501892,0.03238615,0.004933861,0.001855492,0.003028628,0.001570246,0.004217476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8365091,0.03407792,0.1142572,0.007655234,0.002671255,0.002593913,0.001023595,0.0005493963,0.0006623666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6950265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8570915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0507451839943125,"score_gpt":0.3185467825530252,"score_spread":0.2678015985587127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}