{"id":"W2531477340","doi":"10.1002/ecy.1591","title":"Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta‐analyses: its magnitude and implications","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":298,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Research Council; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Meta-regression; Study heterogeneity; Ecology; Generality; Variance (accounting); Statistics; Spatial heterogeneity; Sample size determination; Regression analysis; Econometrics; Biology; Mathematics; Psychology; Confidence interval; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001646686,0.00007562341,0.0001664021,0.00003438358,0.0001291163,0.000002796795,0.00006156523,0.00008534615,0.0009705083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001104707,0.00004887137,0.00002459265,0.00006854439,0.0003258355,0.00008930117,0.0002145874,0.00004940839,0.000136708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006089304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005170273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001101499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006098183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993039,0.0001110234,0.0001373742,0.0002512954,0.00002837736,0.0001680624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994749,0.0003603708,0.0000398092,0.00007456478,0.00000647052,0.00004389145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000428306,0.00006325617,0.9966899,0.000001581335,0.0000930203,0.00000305967,0.00002822648,0.00004892746,0.001283758,0.001341715,0.0001579114,0.0002844008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002250001,0.00006524503,0.9917839,4.268832e-7,0.00008549156,0.00001757115,0.00001015439,0.0001120839,0.00002285246,0.007336509,0.000277633,0.00006311162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926528,0.0003638634,0.00007045023,0.004964539,0.00003062353,0.0001217944,0.00000780784,0.00001389136,0.00177423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981487,0.0004210746,0.000618252,0.000432184,0.00000556743,0.0001065269,0.000001253296,0.000002612592,0.0002638651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006087169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0507451839943125,"score_gpt":0.3185467825530252,"score_spread":0.2678015985587127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}