{"id":"W2531664500","doi":"10.1002/cjce.22843","title":"Shear‐induced aggregation of colloidal particles: A comparison between two different approaches to the modelling of colloidal interactions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Coagulation and Flocculation Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statistical physics; Monte Carlo method; Discrete element method; Cluster (spacecraft); Colloidal particle; Colloid; Population; Stochastic process; Computer science; Biological system; Mechanics; Physics; Mathematics; Chemistry; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001300469,0.000528458,0.0006923461,0.0007715295,0.0003629421,0.0008726969,0.001049178,0.0009073906,0.000587725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002062684,0.0002897705,0.0007042465,0.0004946192,0.0003669559,0.0005692068,0.0006155854,0.0006344757,0.0001538323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007248361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006525957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003341328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002354392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995486,0.0001821316,0.00003318656,0.00003601014,0.0001670419,0.00003296648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987805,0.000717603,0.0001147345,0.000135346,0.0001819723,0.00006983511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004277056,0.0003333669,0.003850786,0.0003049866,0.0001961523,0.0001419497,0.0002135452,0.9062524,0.04713722,0.01958904,0.0001572427,0.02139555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001234529,0.00005329871,0.0003830491,0.000005441126,0.000009055999,0.00001230781,0.00000629848,0.9960448,0.002834318,0.0004524085,0.0001756966,0.00001109579],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6318428,0.001182702,0.360119,0.0002873104,0.00009701998,0.0001483529,0.0001693274,0.0003186577,0.005834835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9079031,0.0006920924,0.0898998,0.00004003615,0.00003066475,0.0001773761,0.0001397883,0.00009386598,0.001023222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003341328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006877601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.154284929748764,"score_gpt":0.2692066753905965,"score_spread":0.1149217456418326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}