{"id":"W2531668889","doi":"10.21314/jor.2016.340","title":"A fuzzy data envelopment analysis model for evaluating the efficiency of socially responsible and conventional mutual funds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Risk","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Equity (law); Credibility; Transparency (behavior); Business; Fuzzy logic; Mutual fund; Accounting; Mutual information; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Finance; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004690616,0.0006870424,0.0008650866,0.001555281,0.0004153983,0.002186764,0.000788119,0.001182923,0.001083815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01025284,0.0002825902,0.001070933,0.001401998,0.0008595326,0.001485431,0.000799763,0.0007137549,0.0001151493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003121317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001520663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009759155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002839412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974196,0.001563421,0.0001312305,0.0002007163,0.000454335,0.0002307329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966214,0.002364894,0.0003704518,0.0001570755,0.000399621,0.00008651498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004370105,0.00003015768,0.001440711,0.00003213739,0.00004352644,0.00005617189,0.00009770315,0.9548613,0.0005359548,0.0373437,0.0001299735,0.005384957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002683108,0.00001879569,0.0002609653,0.000007952206,0.000006932467,0.000006665464,0.00002492737,0.9940048,0.0001947227,0.005315817,0.0001494362,0.000006380242],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2691463,0.0005007154,0.7231213,0.000460728,0.00002453108,0.0001124734,0.0001521982,0.00008993039,0.006391827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842421,0.00009811352,0.01487536,0.00001225853,0.000004298545,0.00006976112,0.00003084815,0.000004513393,0.0006627212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009759155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02480668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4446177604861004,"score_gpt":0.51871623586,"score_spread":0.07409847537389969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}