{"id":"W2531748784","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2016-0255","title":"Runout analysis and mobility observations for large open pit slope failures","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; BGC Engineering (Canada)","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geology; Geotechnical engineering; Landslide; Friction angle; Open-pit mining; Slope stability; Slope failure; Rock mass classification; Mass wasting; Surface finish; Mass movement; Magnetic dip; Mining engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003661633,0.0004201953,0.0003485865,0.002525641,0.0003302547,0.0003846307,0.0004412006,0.000391748,0.0008595285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00149318,0.0001346986,0.0003112968,0.001611133,0.0002065733,0.0004329444,0.0005204414,0.0002938428,0.0005226376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003649698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004555942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01905537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05317925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996986,0.00002267875,0.00003279562,0.00009340769,0.00009167652,0.00006086054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988135,0.0001921415,0.0003947506,0.0001623849,0.0002870889,0.0001502434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003606801,0.000137385,0.9292454,0.00011789,0.00007722853,0.0007631045,0.0005421281,0.01782302,0.006372053,0.0002401857,0.004669505,0.03965143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001597841,0.0001597431,0.9510123,0.00003285898,0.00003079151,0.0004267179,0.0006578068,0.04034836,0.002645034,0.0002970254,0.004340251,0.00003324571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853715,0.0001114073,0.002492558,0.00002554678,0.00000796511,0.00003718413,0.01067009,0.0002835582,0.001000075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767149,0.00009384378,0.003192227,0.000006334229,0.000006790122,0.00004736706,0.01911155,0.00002790803,0.000799035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01905537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03788888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01633201811859305,"score_gpt":0.2437002778043297,"score_spread":0.2273682596857367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}