{"id":"W2531889429","doi":"10.4039/tce.2016.48","title":"Optimising design and effort for environmental surveys using dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Entomologist","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Scarabaeinae; Scarabaeidae; Sampling (signal processing); Dung beetle; Trap (plumbing); Resampling; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Sampling design; Biology; Environmental science; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000887357,0.0001333854,0.0001062013,0.0000309322,0.0005058775,0.00007291467,0.0002068826,0.00009845098,0.003497324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003913567,0.00008494981,0.00004213655,0.00007107065,0.0006823919,0.0001089421,0.0000767293,0.0000584848,0.0003196371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001532814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002698335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04147181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1668115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989346,0.0001102531,0.0001279528,0.000248475,0.0001391185,0.0004395927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993932,0.0001142026,0.00005215863,0.0001888338,0.000004072184,0.0002475615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001413036,0.0001547616,0.7663503,0.00003023906,0.0001517305,0.000132292,0.0009483262,0.001633775,0.09481082,0.002449185,0.0168998,0.1162974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087158,0.0001183829,0.9794091,0.00002173258,0.0000458672,0.0001018815,0.0004249805,0.001291655,0.006169057,0.000379403,0.01070676,0.0004595679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871608,0.0000898825,0.006989299,0.001192742,0.0001221879,0.0005262448,0.0003350976,0.00002384895,0.003559892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984915,0.0000379762,0.0005285586,0.0003476635,0.00002419685,0.0000258277,0.00001759388,0.00001256484,0.0005140677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2130588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05745586124488637,"score_gpt":0.2547668874871096,"score_spread":0.1973110262422232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}