{"id":"W2532322113","doi":"10.1109/tic-sth.2009.5444422","title":"A new layout method for graphical user interfaces","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Interactive and Immersive Displays","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Graphical user interface; Page layout; Window (computing); User interface; Container (type theory); Component (thermodynamics); Graphical user interface testing; Interface (matter); Human–computer interaction; Engineering drawing; User interface design; Programming language; Operating system; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002660587,0.0003019938,0.0003724169,0.000193815,0.00006046792,0.0003207055,0.001673463,0.0002526749,0.0001272835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006072825,0.0002485576,0.0003669117,0.0001266377,0.00001383936,0.0003009759,0.001026759,0.0004906385,0.00006577827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004239743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001764916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002258899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000277065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982932,0.00009325398,0.0002800284,0.0008006266,0.0001948315,0.0003380878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985853,0.0002155275,0.0001420694,0.0007096782,0.0002146521,0.0001327789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000967876,0.0001370196,0.00005578121,0.00007391944,0.0003045255,0.00001081928,0.001393908,0.0002488114,0.006405614,0.5633246,0.3819218,0.04602635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001727289,0.001049473,0.003835054,0.0005073773,0.0001774627,0.00004944358,0.0002540651,0.1342748,0.2227845,0.4394018,0.1936197,0.002319072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003052598,0.0001042242,0.9827708,0.004030609,0.001160982,0.0004252195,0.000009925666,0.00005853889,0.01113445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01829736,0.0000149093,0.9705432,0.003796862,0.0002516318,0.0000704531,0.00001831869,0.00001677934,0.006990455],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2163789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02572340861776513,"score_gpt":0.3471921636812815,"score_spread":0.3214687550635164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}