{"id":"W2532391778","doi":"10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.10.016","title":"Mechanical characterization of novel latania natural fiber reinforced PP/EPDM composites","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polymer Testing","topic":"Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Islamic Azad University","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Charpy impact test; Ultimate tensile strength; Polypropylene; Composite number; Toughness; Fiber; Izod impact strength test; Scanning electron microscope; EPDM rubber; Natural rubber","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000187467,0.0002340292,0.0003057835,0.00008025666,0.0001277487,0.0000622005,0.0004085748,0.00009707974,0.0003267546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003418202,0.0001607327,0.00007469839,0.0003112115,0.00009594707,0.0005872521,0.0002323223,0.0001176662,0.0001790927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004875178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004114774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006026291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.431258e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982842,0.00003782711,0.0005513886,0.0003393936,0.0003725167,0.0004147222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983949,0.0005914952,0.0003754472,0.0003516755,0.0001851553,0.0001013024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003926556,0.00001071103,0.0001349294,0.00002215716,0.000008725365,0.00000191582,0.0000301254,0.000006043348,0.9942197,0.001983735,0.000009380164,0.003533337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006017363,0.00006745804,0.0008773571,0.0002458779,0.00002147357,0.00004418648,0.000001767072,0.00375615,0.9940608,0.00002137982,0.00004969191,0.0002521924],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961054,0.0001201653,0.002221237,0.0002286485,0.0003484742,0.0001838908,0.00005346655,0.0002498797,0.0004888184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857367,0.000001714135,0.01241117,0.0001228314,0.000154656,0.000008982312,0.00002700681,0.0000322355,0.001504728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01036875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6554491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02152202410474926,"score_gpt":0.2424625775270464,"score_spread":0.2209405534222972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}