{"id":"W253363787","doi":"","title":"China Green Input-Output Accounting: Coal, Efficiency of Power Generation and Green House Gas Emissions (1992-2020)/COMPTABILITE DES ENTREES ET SORTIES VERTE DE LA CHINE : CHARBON, EFFICACITE DE LA GENERATION D'ENERGIE ET EMISSION DES GAZ A EFFET DE SERRE (1992-2020)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coal; Greenhouse gas; Electricity generation; Natural gas; China; Environmental science; Environmental economics; Power (physics); Economics; Political science; Physics; Engineering; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006199577,0.000816575,0.0002824398,0.00242658,0.0004050676,0.001115536,0.0005437479,0.0003240411,0.002686682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001154255,0.0002675068,0.0004371345,0.007495277,0.0002662011,0.0006375436,0.0003486023,0.0002622328,0.000371025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008530531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007889801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4764515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5206177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996063,0.00005379367,0.00002549619,0.00004578984,0.00019906,0.00006962275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994752,0.00004383673,0.0001014037,0.00004306764,0.0002969537,0.0000396856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004356612,0.0001313929,0.5977774,0.0009690723,0.0007741234,0.00057246,0.000417486,0.1869109,0.002026955,0.03300412,0.08141779,0.09556253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005957042,0.00006003237,0.7707002,0.00009933626,0.000501114,0.00009368008,0.0003266703,0.1559252,0.005610648,0.00517562,0.0613726,0.00007527061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8394313,0.008358437,0.008514981,0.003351971,0.0004235417,0.000218473,0.09919298,0.0009321571,0.03957602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668055,0.001838151,0.001050816,0.00007326951,0.00004190339,0.00004678483,0.01633689,0.00003161559,0.01377495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4764515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9473566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007693118272953905,"score_gpt":0.2492217411764915,"score_spread":0.2415286229035375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}