{"id":"W2533995846","doi":"10.1109/iembs.1991.684150","title":"Regularization Of The Inverse Epicardial Solution Using Linearly Constrained Optimization","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Statistical and numerical algorithms","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tikhonov regularization; Regularization (linguistics); Inverse problem; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Inverse; Mathematical optimization; Backus–Gilbert method; Mathematical analysis; Constrained optimization problem; Optimization problem; Regularization perspectives on support vector machines; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001153818,0.0007784124,0.0006825706,0.000568555,0.0003280253,0.0009886096,0.0008730956,0.001231036,0.001428838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003374819,0.0004362579,0.0006557716,0.0005404593,0.0009310303,0.0008355579,0.001287846,0.001252597,0.0006069506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005135444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001323965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002456741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001977889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994123,0.0002479596,0.00003022711,0.00008789569,0.0001883524,0.00003320331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993765,0.0003574384,0.00005836197,0.00007527978,0.0001080122,0.00002436213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008055384,0.00004410809,0.0003092692,0.0001632108,0.00007189302,0.0001162159,0.0001183104,0.7812002,0.03420296,0.09542458,0.002578255,0.0856905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005308851,0.000009437661,0.00005878983,0.000004198814,0.000002780723,0.00001793965,0.000003509064,0.9903238,0.001681263,0.007119448,0.0007651887,0.000008267107],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003210993,0.00006806228,0.9956775,0.0001033148,0.00001511752,0.00001015415,0.00001452957,0.00009342165,0.0008070111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1939868,0.0004094886,0.798093,0.0002015442,0.0001058138,0.0002302791,0.0002007205,0.000349589,0.006422827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002456741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006102026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04753696702034659,"score_gpt":0.2949417885862916,"score_spread":0.247404821565945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}