{"id":"W2534088988","doi":"10.17269/cjph.107.5360","title":"Supportive neighbourhood built characteristics and dog-walking in Canadian adults","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Walkability; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Built environment; Pedestrian; Logistic regression; Odds; Demography; Perception; Psychology; HUBzero; Geography; Physical activity; Medicine; Environmental health; Pet therapy; Animal welfare; Physical therapy; Mathematics; Engineering; Ecology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000453603,0.0003418128,0.000440843,0.00122184,0.003270909,0.001514401,0.001211423,0.000933148,0.003658235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001768159,0.0004305519,0.0006900754,0.00320619,0.0007502939,0.0005288619,0.000922985,0.001191939,0.0003481591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007614614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009059214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9830536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994115,0.00004287242,0.00004673134,0.00008656495,0.0001757643,0.0002366275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985997,0.00005302404,0.0002971053,0.0000389511,0.0004552128,0.0005559403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005141481,0.00007977959,0.9945905,0.0000225637,0.00003534682,0.00008948211,0.002511053,0.00003059418,0.00009293174,0.0000700847,0.0003804868,0.002045671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001902767,0.00002357683,0.9956113,0.00001615786,0.00001181105,0.00002860693,0.003891083,0.00003764015,0.000008916845,0.00001411335,0.0003480805,0.000006738926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959085,0.0004128854,0.00003301158,0.0002011988,0.00001381188,0.0000200283,0.0008216393,0.000002962133,0.002586008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998006,0.00033587,0.00008916426,0.00006992279,0.000005631545,0.00001041142,0.0003984129,0.00000229721,0.001082296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01694638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05524814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02885153395480002,"score_gpt":0.3293412753868178,"score_spread":0.3004897414320178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}