{"id":"W2534164515","doi":"10.1109/iesm.2015.7380207","title":"Reliability analysis of supply chain for contingency operations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Reliability (semiconductor); Population; Distribution center; Contingency; Reliability engineering; First-order reliability method; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Distribution (mathematics); Operations research; Statistics; Engineering; Business; Mathematics; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004176149,0.00006456675,0.0002982316,0.0002568705,0.00004050358,0.00003973917,0.0003229509,0.00004353099,0.0002010029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01436105,0.00004089406,0.000205547,0.001249003,0.00005463746,0.0001066649,0.00003497504,0.00002914327,0.00001436253],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002178885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009667208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009151087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007616668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986205,0.00005986708,0.0005211328,0.0002484249,0.0004311219,0.0001189415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974221,0.0009987997,0.00005290861,0.0004818855,0.0009451957,0.00009913777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002333898,0.00009302582,0.007722813,0.000003976611,0.0001614932,2.12943e-7,0.0006361384,0.9066415,0.0002716314,0.06871267,0.01383269,0.001900485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000286794,0.00008331373,0.01025765,0.000001891951,0.0002388546,2.106809e-7,0.000431947,0.9683096,0.0002523321,0.01617506,0.003860731,0.0001015643],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04563031,0.00004839788,0.9511716,0.0003338359,0.0001543643,0.0002213576,0.00004120665,0.0000292931,0.002369663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241727,8.022806e-7,0.07238935,0.00003199076,0.00002015681,0.00002254154,0.000007870792,0.000003084979,0.003351506],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8787822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1430928506050623,"score_gpt":0.3720140141820011,"score_spread":0.2289211635769388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}