{"id":"W2535661614","doi":"10.14288/1.0168437","title":"On criminalized livelihoods and community forestry : a case study of traditional forest use by tribal communities in South Gujarat, India","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Community forestry; Forestry; Geography; Socioeconomics; Political science; Environmental protection; Agroforestry; Environmental planning; Economic growth; Agriculture; Forest management; Sociology; Archaeology; Environmental science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001873623,0.0006084739,0.000552367,0.002256895,0.01685491,0.003598643,0.003028166,0.002727005,0.001921934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00397772,0.0006599668,0.0004289847,0.003291511,0.008077523,0.001926064,0.005753284,0.002995959,0.0001940884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007744188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004597836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1377019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.324405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967155,0.001635795,0.0001003938,0.0001758647,0.0003245588,0.001047778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966382,0.001500903,0.0007033271,0.0001721967,0.0002248191,0.0007606045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090242,0.0004664687,0.05159504,0.0002121274,0.00002523133,0.04677095,0.888702,0.000113458,0.0004394133,0.003322371,0.0009271204,0.007374869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000488143,0.00007651097,0.02303565,0.0001242266,0.00001006587,0.004264343,0.9694094,0.0001117521,0.00009219475,0.0001669184,0.002689708,0.00001425666],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969221,0.000324798,0.00006295116,0.0006769578,0.000008390765,0.00005335833,0.00001776781,0.000001897218,0.001931804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981366,0.0006919539,0.0001403906,0.0002962304,0.000008369608,0.00003477861,0.00001604576,0.00000297219,0.0006726314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1377019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2738007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03281823725995585,"score_gpt":0.1842178817383812,"score_spread":0.1513996444784253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}