{"id":"W2537140541","doi":"10.1109/passat/socialcom.2011.184","title":"Trend Analysis of the CVE for Software Vulnerability Management","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Information and Cyber Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Computer science; Vulnerability assessment; Authentication (law); Vulnerability management; Computer security; Process (computing); Risk management; Business; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003823806,0.0004047354,0.0003714839,0.01456063,0.0004282068,0.001670758,0.0004770053,0.0003814444,0.001344073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02025979,0.0001724281,0.0006974526,0.01179168,0.0003023176,0.002305174,0.0007474191,0.0007828955,0.0004336117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009417963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007745059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006090198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007211597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971903,0.0004283876,0.0004415075,0.0005203952,0.001229904,0.0001895927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728872,0.01032768,0.007917009,0.001732078,0.006650274,0.0004858837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001131714,0.00006999786,0.8644285,0.0002021816,0.000202567,0.0001789739,0.001134757,0.004397686,0.002675771,0.002427373,0.00312781,0.1210412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006277274,0.0002525655,0.9455413,0.0001132304,0.00007426339,0.0005690103,0.001860121,0.03611189,0.002443022,0.00233128,0.0106384,0.00005868524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9538142,0.001095351,0.02376831,0.000512389,0.00005173645,0.0001949458,0.01216562,0.0005850056,0.007812463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765676,0.0003806541,0.01499169,0.0000240102,0.00003041563,0.0001456544,0.00698778,0.00004813051,0.0008241312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01456063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02022243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02816237780774617,"score_gpt":0.2470175848510456,"score_spread":0.2188552070432994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}