{"id":"W2538247051","doi":"10.1109/ursiap-rasc.2016.7601267","title":"On use of focusing media for elimination of inverse problem ill-posedness in microwave tomography","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Inverse problem; Well-posed problem; Inverse; Inverse scattering problem; Microwave imaging; Tomography; Space (punctuation); Free space; Electromagnetics; Computer science; Microwave; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Physics; Optics; Telecommunications; Geometry; Engineering physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001344143,0.001029969,0.000465662,0.0008084406,0.0004176375,0.001128593,0.0004896155,0.001061846,0.001477227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002497852,0.0003627548,0.0004981765,0.0004331776,0.001882162,0.001527601,0.001300923,0.001213997,0.000457414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002154382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002675448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001488115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002203596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995535,0.0002229255,0.00002146427,0.00005030807,0.0001238206,0.00002796413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987231,0.0009606658,0.00009724998,0.0001092627,0.00008631595,0.00002333243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002758806,0.0001275073,0.0006714496,0.0007157025,0.00006353276,0.0007650581,0.0006944306,0.03982303,0.2874923,0.5148044,0.002292866,0.1522738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000727077,0.0005702179,0.0009596415,0.000393782,0.00008808992,0.002591694,0.000289444,0.4285903,0.301612,0.2228873,0.04178284,0.0001620623],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01716677,0.002530398,0.9702545,0.0005518195,0.00009045921,0.00005445676,0.00002898024,0.0001716364,0.009150949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2088788,0.006644154,0.7747803,0.0006081974,0.0002382975,0.0002205313,0.0001159671,0.0002648265,0.008248884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001477227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007108629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01808871884003895,"score_gpt":0.2109664636982177,"score_spread":0.1928777448581787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}