{"id":"W2538309467","doi":"10.1121/1.3654646","title":"Finding schwa: Comparing the results of an automatic aligner with human judgments when identifying schwa in a corpus of spoken French","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Schwa; Computer science; Phone; Context (archaeology); Natural language processing; Word (group theory); Speech recognition; Phonetics; Coding (social sciences); Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Vowel; Mathematics; Statistics; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00169083,0.0001454965,0.0004294988,0.00005625812,0.0001714891,0.0000350611,0.002670596,0.00005684338,0.000005493643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001750944,0.00006637191,0.0001665857,0.0005011159,0.0006576987,0.0003630339,0.0005557347,0.00052029,2.724409e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006576175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008927212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007147955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009357124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978772,0.0002634493,0.0007679241,0.0001321192,0.000721673,0.0002376475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972963,0.0003139491,0.00151396,0.0006081942,0.0002163638,0.00005124881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001034745,0.003113297,0.01916827,0.001575975,0.001893711,0.00006318979,0.2623378,0.005191819,0.5770534,0.001324781,0.009287764,0.1179553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003198513,0.002178611,0.0460599,0.004970383,0.0006464962,0.0003033442,0.006509874,0.7091665,0.1755126,0.05082853,0.00002212947,0.0006031449],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6180749,0.0005069296,0.3802946,0.0006323037,0.00008698884,0.0002345698,0.000003281297,0.00003744396,0.0001289893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6559979,0.00001100261,0.3438698,0.00008878706,0.00001598466,7.568653e-7,1.286683e-7,0.000006748065,0.000008922175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7039747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4962677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0390358446116823,"score_gpt":0.287982443924876,"score_spread":0.2489465993131937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}