{"id":"W2538377812","doi":"10.1108/qrom-01-2016-1351","title":"The critical incident technique reappraised","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Critical Incident Technique; Transformational leadership; Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Organizational theory; Public relations; Organizational behavior; Knowledge management; Psychology; Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Business; Management; Social psychology; Political science; Engineering; Marketing; Cognitive psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05307288,0.001884507,0.001382813,0.01216514,0.005032101,0.01585304,0.004646201,0.004510103,0.009334484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1020093,0.001082185,0.001382295,0.009135857,0.01735753,0.01393853,0.01333404,0.008034993,0.005406915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005902652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01300481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002416143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002299726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8782558,0.08062441,0.00811061,0.007684237,0.02344338,0.001881492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8214589,0.1005843,0.0131925,0.03124875,0.03095425,0.002561263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002300302,0.0001572807,0.003262877,0.004369773,0.00009369081,0.0008537088,0.0519076,0.0008150478,0.004551405,0.2763081,0.02475376,0.6326967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005513016,0.0003005143,0.00238118,0.01088672,0.00009302155,0.004441049,0.03171081,0.002008034,0.00498103,0.1295001,0.8134335,0.0002089882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008706023,0.01252966,0.8456402,0.01582071,0.005383431,0.005364876,0.0005566935,0.00178289,0.1042156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1783409,0.01186148,0.7576002,0.009171256,0.002551083,0.008896905,0.0004806058,0.0009905135,0.03010701],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05307288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2806796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1362908375071109,"score_gpt":0.5751578290247623,"score_spread":0.4388669915176514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}