{"id":"W2538488284","doi":"10.1016/j.jid.2016.08.021","title":"Research Techniques Made Simple: Assessing Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Investigative Dermatology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":308,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Systematic review; Protocol (science); Transparency (behavior); Publication bias; Publishing; Risk analysis (engineering); MEDLINE; Actuarial science; Computer science; Psychology; Data science; Meta-analysis; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Business; Computer security; Pathology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4308736,0.0008946582,0.04304215,0.006255154,0.0001490931,0.0005131162,0.005267433,0.0007459814,0.0008482413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5095271,0.0003320828,0.007266301,0.005627007,0.001169848,0.0006895788,0.0004336889,0.00230474,0.0009027977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003098337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001525951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009785629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001459214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6451908,0.2927051,0.05376174,0.0009466216,0.006773399,0.0006224035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7535772,0.1105578,0.12285,0.004776996,0.007739124,0.0004988681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005317721,0.0001637862,0.0008699655,0.4644699,0.002308772,0.000471525,0.0008583816,8.426225e-7,0.00004551417,0.003308702,0.1299622,0.3975351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001076736,0.00006161372,0.00003026388,0.2261788,0.001500142,0.001828182,0.0004292172,0.00001326784,0.0001128743,0.02081839,0.7486445,0.0002751034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000198889,0.9928842,0.0017433,0.0002783063,0.0002550525,0.003510527,0.00003037787,0.000002958365,0.00109642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002521081,0.9912374,0.007671515,0.00006265082,0.0001561374,0.0001905893,0.000003173641,0.00004456224,0.0003818686],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6186823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9161941926720168,"score_gpt":0.6522576114064148,"score_spread":0.263936581265602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}