{"id":"W2539873001","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.10.001","title":"Revisiting the information audit: A systematic literature review and synthesis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information Management","topic":"Information Architecture and Usability","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Capability Maturity Model; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Maturity (psychological); Information quality; Standardization; Audit; Quality (philosophy); Information management; Quality audit; Quality management; Systematic review; Process management; Management science; Computer science; Information system; Engineering; Business; Operations management; Accounting; Political science; Management system; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1956118,0.002697532,0.01490381,0.03896428,0.003098917,0.01008137,0.005195125,0.004740475,0.004183583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4672388,0.003585345,0.00964292,0.02539814,0.004731305,0.01100663,0.005887839,0.004421862,0.0005628426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01923877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08170634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01272942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05131695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7583404,0.1071455,0.09311085,0.007967122,0.03091393,0.002522142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4484093,0.4079688,0.06779219,0.01459887,0.05835469,0.0028762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004146837,0.00008811901,0.002894764,0.910997,0.009447706,0.000263529,0.003508328,0.0001981409,0.0003538468,0.0006876581,0.002874141,0.06827199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004019691,0.0003182625,0.004354747,0.929096,0.0426489,0.0002503542,0.004045855,0.000197944,0.0004393539,0.001156867,0.01699037,0.0000993991],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01013544,0.9670902,0.003242434,0.005182414,0.001488289,0.01004359,0.00153814,0.00004786758,0.001231585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.149096,0.8021984,0.02222152,0.008371898,0.0006848176,0.0153437,0.001406546,0.0000723551,0.000604875],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1956118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005192801787997195,"score_gpt":0.2321698112058621,"score_spread":0.2269770094178649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}