{"id":"W2541597427","doi":"10.1109/iccsii.2012.6454312","title":"On understanding software quality evolution from a defect perspective: A case study on an open source software system","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Software quality analyst; Software evolution; Computer science; Software quality; Software quality control; Software quality assurance; Quality assurance; Metric (unit); Quality (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Software metric; Open source software; Software system; Software engineering; Software; Software maintenance; Open source; Software development; Software construction; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Operations management; Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004287522,0.0005080993,0.0004037043,0.00291184,0.001154986,0.001619874,0.001302731,0.002117801,0.000678066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02218199,0.000288607,0.0004368846,0.003468427,0.001609662,0.003443089,0.001143275,0.00118643,0.0001150622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001629275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007539231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01144737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02006475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970868,0.00161122,0.0001725537,0.0002962483,0.0006360754,0.0001970973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950956,0.04123016,0.003802037,0.001157602,0.002349913,0.0005043567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006407087,0.004383881,0.5731133,0.001529577,0.0002373501,0.02360692,0.0780988,0.06082116,0.02610027,0.01615637,0.001883121,0.2134287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001577159,0.003064786,0.5479451,0.0005083223,0.0003024261,0.009612953,0.08411853,0.313986,0.01828229,0.01136413,0.01042525,0.0002324693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901763,0.000227443,0.007942029,0.0004105947,0.00000311031,0.00006219144,0.00005710525,0.00001656677,0.001104671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822631,0.0003364458,0.01670177,0.00006336513,0.000009946508,0.00003625688,0.0001106366,0.00001560609,0.0004629137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01144737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02276146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1127066081727112,"score_gpt":0.3738947011396486,"score_spread":0.2611880929669374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}