{"id":"W2541707837","doi":"10.1017/s0959269516000247","title":"The impact of pragmatic markers and hedging on sentence comprehension: a case study of<i>comme</i>and<i>genre</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of French Language Studies","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Comprehension; Linguistics; Sentence processing; Meaning (existential); Computer science; Natural language processing; Task (project management); Noun; Pragmatics; Focus (optics); Representation (politics); Semantics (computer science); Artificial intelligence; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004114739,0.0001129519,0.000370299,0.00008936642,0.0002239832,0.0000374119,0.00007496508,0.000009594804,0.00002618138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003848193,0.00004561431,0.000112804,0.00003136601,0.0003077129,0.00005802284,0.00006632162,0.00007171009,2.963742e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001535969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001838851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001143407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001153618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991137,0.00009155233,0.0004153354,0.00007424896,0.0001975657,0.0001075512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998115,0.0008557214,0.0004796949,0.0001345512,0.0003720487,0.00004299331],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003284515,0.001490344,0.05614792,0.0003217504,0.01155402,0.005273486,0.8617108,0.00005165798,0.0009961388,0.004714866,0.01183878,0.04557178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002228182,0.002956076,0.004811476,0.000894727,0.0009296931,0.0006163282,0.9860454,0.00008486853,0.00004741061,0.000727299,0.0004463093,0.0002122385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877717,0.0105451,0.00000393295,0.0001701582,0.0001166851,0.00007708039,0.00001188682,0.000002369518,0.001301054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985885,0.0009152682,0.00002374161,0.00001762357,0.000219426,9.84076e-7,7.884226e-8,0.000005270432,0.0002290984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1243346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1860097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05220898351260718,"score_gpt":0.3432382995379733,"score_spread":0.2910293160253661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}