{"id":"W2541708856","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2016.10.007","title":"Species’ habitat use inferred from environmental variables at multiple scales: How much we gain from high-resolution vegetation data?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Lidar; Scale (ratio); Range (aeronautics); Land cover; Endangered species; Spatial ecology; Remote sensing; Ecology; Environmental science; Cartography; Physical geography; Land use","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01249311,0.00164867,0.002218856,0.002573616,0.000707956,0.004516202,0.002093212,0.003198644,0.003682599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04800992,0.001538958,0.00159395,0.004850455,0.002175492,0.01440289,0.004149499,0.003619826,0.00160827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005331491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007745771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006376926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01265516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996673,0.001749712,0.0002557394,0.0005809179,0.0005092629,0.0002314427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489548,0.03614485,0.003056805,0.00791141,0.003084365,0.0008476739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006340555,0.0003559322,0.5779552,0.001489406,0.004131977,0.0004245419,0.001395627,0.01123154,0.006484477,0.004870122,0.01138858,0.3796386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001257911,0.0002796233,0.7877418,0.001659576,0.002792524,0.001320018,0.00514287,0.05651062,0.005086338,0.08847291,0.05039968,0.0004682589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7913849,0.0541371,0.08823778,0.03677326,0.001377763,0.00007488766,0.01330769,0.0004333486,0.0142732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9222603,0.02011789,0.04609545,0.003037364,0.001600398,0.00007149718,0.005318775,0.0001432009,0.001355051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01249311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06607074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02320235257204117,"score_gpt":0.19885425251842,"score_spread":0.1756518999463788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}