{"id":"W2541708856","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2016.10.007","title":"Species’ habitat use inferred from environmental variables at multiple scales: How much we gain from high-resolution vegetation data?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Lidar; Scale (ratio); Range (aeronautics); Land cover; Endangered species; Spatial ecology; Remote sensing; Ecology; Environmental science; Cartography; Physical geography; Land use","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003480389,0.0001699634,0.0001750554,0.00009994351,0.0001541233,0.0001418252,0.0003463167,0.0001390756,0.0004562435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001860218,0.0001377991,0.00004172146,0.00007950731,0.0001361211,0.004158329,0.0002456117,0.0001165806,0.0002010246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002534504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002111537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001344627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001256114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983218,0.00005171822,0.0005993426,0.000229714,0.0006371225,0.0001602684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983913,0.0004577495,0.000776841,0.0002261633,0.00005504536,0.00009295682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006667062,0.00009808542,0.9219836,0.000004190254,0.0001365837,0.000004076839,0.0008110589,0.002712225,0.03844839,0.0007140534,0.003865093,0.03055597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001951503,0.00003725864,0.9602511,0.00004448279,0.00002701256,0.000006072252,0.0001746215,0.02203722,0.001862223,0.002332838,0.0111105,0.0001651577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720577,0.00002241874,0.02290221,0.003901182,0.0005089293,0.0001786409,0.0002796533,0.00002204181,0.0001272135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988064,0.000281271,0.00890363,0.0008344001,0.0002258763,0.000007046781,0.001486207,0.000009968838,0.0001875983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03826753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5619284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02320235257204117,"score_gpt":0.19885425251842,"score_spread":0.1756518999463788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}