{"id":"W2542748730","doi":"10.1075/cilt.319.10has","title":"Investigating the emphatic feature in Iraqi Arabic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 4, Current issues in linguistic theory","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Consonant; Articulation (sociology); Larynx; Phonotactics; Place of articulation; Arabic; Tongue; Feature (linguistics); Speech recognition; Linguistics; Manner of articulation; Acoustics; Psychology; Audiology; Phonology; Computer science; Vowel; Medicine; Philosophy; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001329562,0.0001984754,0.00008943416,0.0002380017,0.0002966167,0.0004037541,0.000209366,0.0002561141,0.003089634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005108989,0.00005479973,0.00005378791,0.0002309683,0.0005134901,0.0002589606,0.0003298275,0.000295745,0.0005569882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001821914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001679749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007957742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002074183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999497,0.00001545249,0.000002152529,0.00001330912,0.0000154283,0.000004059323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999796,0.0001327488,0.00002246349,0.00001060701,0.00002807768,0.00001012223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003006587,0.0001622481,0.01771843,0.0008257538,0.00001688099,0.001904199,0.02364302,0.0002719031,0.6767012,0.006679806,0.002362177,0.2694137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003347,0.0009513422,0.7058085,0.0002156709,0.00005915488,0.00965265,0.02058992,0.001756087,0.1401574,0.007724763,0.1129869,0.00006422659],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9255097,0.005195932,0.004646599,0.0006959284,0.00008986606,0.000027619,0.00009014477,0.00004262046,0.0637015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720814,0.003641731,0.005878527,0.0002942051,0.00007672493,0.0000309605,0.00009451512,0.00003204899,0.01786991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003089634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01033586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09887401481073092,"score_gpt":0.383256077163161,"score_spread":0.28438206235243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}