{"id":"W2545455395","doi":"10.31542/j.muse.216","title":"Apple Inc-A Marketing Analysis Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacEwan University Student eJournal","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marketing; Market segmentation; Order (exchange); Product (mathematics); Business; Marketing strategy; Consumer market; Market analysis; Competitive advantage; Electronics; Advertising; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001669819,0.0002253082,0.0003110074,0.0007074354,0.0005794685,0.0003465057,0.0005115804,0.00005327753,0.0004251476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007748036,0.0002420131,0.0001451443,0.001647364,0.00009024257,0.001028848,0.001076225,0.0002531863,0.0001043154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005760632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003030888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004265915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002321627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998183,0.0001036812,0.0002503601,0.0003886829,0.000706468,0.0003677856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990677,0.00004653991,0.0002577418,0.0003443326,0.0002146772,0.00006901769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001159329,0.0007592387,0.9831632,0.00001914227,0.0004593848,0.01001533,0.0009941771,0.002150865,0.000002507963,0.00004800253,0.001426743,0.0008454957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002302522,0.00003295939,0.6195505,0.000006695509,0.001802988,0.0001940164,0.3368595,0.0014279,6.301575e-7,0.00002500383,0.03738288,0.0004144396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948071,0.00001536129,0.0005333,0.0003707484,0.000168922,0.000412251,0.000004870587,0.00009291404,0.003594547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985288,0.000001671305,0.0001217729,0.0001681686,0.0003104525,0.000001046181,0.00001604633,0.0000169611,0.000835031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3636127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01610164524783151,"score_gpt":0.2338392564848165,"score_spread":0.217737611236985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}