{"id":"W2545455765","doi":"10.1080/11956860.2001.11682651","title":"Peatland restoration in southern Québec (Canada): A paleoecological perspective>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecoscience","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss Association","keywords":"Bog; Macrofossil; Ombrotrophic; Peat; Ecological succession; Ecology; Sphagnum; Vegetation (pathology); Stand development; Fire regime; Black spruce; Restoration ecology; Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Ecosystem; Geography; Biology; Taiga; Pollen","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002917345,0.0002141875,0.0001977203,0.001363829,0.002682045,0.001352053,0.0007006767,0.0003956921,0.002586797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005257978,0.0001696998,0.0001831719,0.002548156,0.001031771,0.0004008953,0.0004721576,0.0003879577,0.0001707531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02444363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01836124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998415,0.00001524959,0.000003949681,0.00003149977,0.0000341243,0.00007380858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995142,0.00004479748,0.00008654991,0.00001539544,0.0001914158,0.0001477797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002038656,0.00009538725,0.9112253,0.0002117918,0.0001002184,0.001494483,0.008795661,0.001369204,0.006420127,0.0008238913,0.00262852,0.06663144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003670469,0.00001663378,0.9903386,0.00003634908,0.00000946515,0.00009712808,0.003218,0.0005455099,0.000170318,0.00004590058,0.005508272,0.00001007331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994211,0.001205031,0.0001920876,0.0003694929,0.00001031906,0.00002104599,0.001040246,0.00001699825,0.002933837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956291,0.0006026526,0.0005140993,0.0001290425,0.000005812652,0.00001161032,0.0005930256,0.000007561437,0.002507187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02444363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1773518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009026692552551402,"score_gpt":0.2136008138680449,"score_spread":0.2045741213154935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}