{"id":"W2545821477","doi":"10.1080/11956860.2001.11682676","title":"Patterns of distribution, relative abundance, and microhabitat use of anurans in a boreal landscape influenced by fire and timber harvest","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecoscience","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Taiga; Geography; Ecology; Boreal; Forestry; Understory; Deciduous; Transect; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Canopy; Fire regime; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019046,0.0001184193,0.00008398306,0.000473097,0.0003132725,0.0003574203,0.000174201,0.0001046138,0.000714968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003027479,0.00009996177,0.00006263991,0.0002958395,0.0002907895,0.000180774,0.0001769151,0.000113082,0.00008978356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003131014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001261252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04832589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2169055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999112,0.00001634905,0.000005105309,0.00002550047,0.00001401132,0.00002777744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996772,0.00003527059,0.0001289174,0.00001404839,0.00004821783,0.00009630519],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007204052,0.00002626688,0.9936579,0.000005716693,0.00001632101,0.00005421918,0.0004061253,0.00006997278,0.002455143,0.0000258693,0.00009266228,0.003117741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.49286e-7,0.00001005421,0.9997159,0.000001106619,0.000001919469,0.00003049243,0.0001337174,0.0000439748,0.00001870985,0.000003053097,0.00003968021,7.231166e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997129,0.00002885464,0.00001686981,0.000003916829,5.007077e-7,0.000001290104,0.00004996926,0.00000139634,0.0001842125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996228,0.00002968895,0.00006034607,0.000005287101,0.000001448345,0.000002394526,0.00009670507,6.022907e-7,0.0001806279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04832589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09608924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006465022372910594,"score_gpt":0.2027545827136335,"score_spread":0.1962895603407229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}