{"id":"W2546832224","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20160006","title":"Evaluating alignment between Canadian Common Drug Review reimbursement recommendations and provincial drug plan listing decisions: an exploratory study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CMAJ Open","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Listing (finance); Drug; Reimbursement; Plan (archaeology); Business; Medicine; Pharmacology; Political science; Geography; Health care; Finance; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04318124,0.0002575679,0.001109835,0.0002821256,0.0008240244,0.0002914591,0.0008012671,0.00006266006,0.000642768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004256298,0.0002590904,0.00005338304,0.0001732015,0.00004885901,0.001269182,0.000377492,0.0001563316,0.0006284785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00134382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006398649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1281067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993229,0.001444773,0.003767734,0.0008800335,0.0001697353,0.000508668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950865,0.001618471,0.001711096,0.0009246368,0.000100206,0.0005591132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000185001,0.0003514525,0.6067017,0.0004041031,0.0002087829,0.000005236022,0.01938808,0.000008174386,0.000002096521,0.006790674,0.2847041,0.08141708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008812529,0.001337396,0.2728186,0.01633286,0.0002752601,0.00001124702,0.04727225,0.0007881841,0.00001643025,0.02574014,0.6233351,0.003259984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8579171,0.00648574,0.0002532361,0.1199203,0.0007152277,0.009688159,0.00150934,0.00006840733,0.003442466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719824,0.001660365,0.004604601,0.01783966,0.0006376673,0.001771975,0.0002760321,0.00008857481,0.00113879],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.338631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6104401697275535,"score_gpt":0.5124463990623467,"score_spread":0.09799377066520687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}