{"id":"W2546832224","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20160006","title":"Evaluating alignment between Canadian Common Drug Review reimbursement recommendations and provincial drug plan listing decisions: an exploratory study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CMAJ Open","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Listing (finance); Drug; Reimbursement; Plan (archaeology); Business; Medicine; Pharmacology; Political science; Geography; Health care; Finance; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0598372,0.0005088603,0.001036849,0.004162649,0.003608985,0.003995326,0.00242463,0.001027434,0.001804064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2488756,0.0006079137,0.001711118,0.01141818,0.002254026,0.001853303,0.003244524,0.001683612,0.00019734],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05571404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08035325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8948573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9085258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9355332,0.02241911,0.005835374,0.005040713,0.02746304,0.003708505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6606307,0.1517146,0.07782528,0.01305988,0.08925348,0.007516034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003107735,0.0001060227,0.9807035,0.000197499,0.0004122724,0.0000374192,0.004508304,0.0005095688,0.00004620372,0.0003207232,0.001138553,0.01170907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008056228,0.0001935623,0.9871932,0.0002230192,0.0002621696,0.00005015146,0.004996269,0.004007934,0.0001247403,0.000193669,0.002625081,0.00004977229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892634,0.0007644389,0.00111271,0.0007313103,0.00002773466,0.000684992,0.002401405,0.00003394109,0.004980171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964166,0.0001422156,0.001797628,0.0001542076,0.00001443452,0.000248644,0.00103037,0.000008972572,0.000186975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.944286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4042355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6104401697275535,"score_gpt":0.5124463990623467,"score_spread":0.09799377066520687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}