{"id":"W2546859432","doi":"10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.10.038","title":"Re-evaluation of using rhodolith growth patterns for paleoenvironmental reconstruction: An example from the Gulf of Panama","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Museum of Natural History; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; University of Alabama","keywords":"Panama; Archipelago; Growth rate; Oceanography; Arctic; Seawater; Geology; Proxy (statistics); Physical geography; Paleontology; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001967472,0.0004950329,0.0003466653,0.002312405,0.0009067324,0.001491825,0.0005960987,0.0003389854,0.001833459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004100492,0.0001909515,0.0003880672,0.004170787,0.0005436676,0.0008487497,0.001418661,0.0004334507,0.0002811446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007553005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009001018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1244688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2563006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996195,0.0001305524,0.00004771343,0.00009023438,0.00006476749,0.00004721584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986022,0.0002856251,0.00017655,0.000355273,0.0005129629,0.00006744479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002431008,0.00007562975,0.8513012,0.0001866555,0.0004914771,0.00104463,0.004412854,0.004067986,0.009404792,0.0008423332,0.001080475,0.1268488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002012802,0.00005227798,0.9708652,0.00008501291,0.0002540799,0.0004326301,0.005513234,0.00838861,0.00230113,0.0003501081,0.01171278,0.00002485339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991723,0.0009062954,0.001682594,0.0004423672,0.0000249956,0.00002565661,0.0007629349,0.00005716876,0.00437511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937404,0.0004904664,0.004442608,0.00002853501,0.000008365111,0.00001217495,0.0007652014,0.0000309421,0.0004812711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1244688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2474886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05404070890319672,"score_gpt":0.2494478442807673,"score_spread":0.1954071353775706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}