{"id":"W2547335583","doi":"10.1017/s0376892916000400","title":"Assessing ecosystem services in Neotropical dry forests: a systematic review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Provisioning; Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Sustainable management; Environmental science; Ecology; Business; Agroforestry; Geography; Biology; Sustainability; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007089306,0.0005631187,0.001648283,0.0001468186,0.0002109424,0.0001270076,0.0006569158,0.0002615961,0.001226033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003686776,0.0004156508,0.0003748932,0.0003312582,0.0001230947,0.0005918465,0.0006584863,0.0002484936,0.002706237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001644518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002434668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008853916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002691974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961489,0.0006856517,0.001308189,0.0007721482,0.000675438,0.0004096712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805,0.0002178025,0.0009172282,0.0006922974,0.000003109881,0.0001195219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003446571,0.00018878,0.07191065,0.8813441,0.0001128366,0.00005855492,0.00009319056,0.000001256184,0.000001490413,0.000007486198,0.0002129667,0.04606524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002679737,0.00003092668,0.02918569,0.4789488,0.0009346163,0.00002059225,0.000134277,0.0000917329,1.854231e-7,0.00001784607,0.4897729,0.0005945133],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002438425,0.9927199,0.00005521575,0.0002303235,0.0001462162,0.003619487,0.00005700238,0.00006131118,0.0006721185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004652474,0.9972946,0.00008923122,0.0007907479,0.00004512412,0.0003424085,0.0002684017,0.00004373076,0.0006604799],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4895599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02183467682710257,"score_gpt":0.257423218041279,"score_spread":0.2355885412141764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}