{"id":"W2547471868","doi":"10.1111/cdev.12656","title":"Out of Reach, Out of Mind? Infants’ Comprehension of References to Hidden Inaccessible Objects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child Development","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object permanence; Referent; Psychology; Object (grammar); Comprehension; Container (type theory); Cognitive psychology; Theory of mind; Communication; Developmental psychology; Cognitive development; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007211723,0.0002802112,0.0002859301,0.0002100561,0.000118216,0.0007917816,0.0002737872,0.0005935008,0.001195664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007517117,0.000304512,0.0001335442,0.0001357611,0.0005171773,0.001174177,0.0004877972,0.0005969477,0.0003288268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000144354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001495546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002010076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001722461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997132,0.00006942538,0.00002411046,0.00005173545,0.0001011806,0.00004036957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975198,0.0013846,0.0006308872,0.0001638456,0.0001828564,0.0001180168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001189807,0.0002003975,0.2014376,0.0006215626,0.00005978981,0.00769641,0.1789926,0.0003026813,0.5428936,0.001867203,0.0008691848,0.06386916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004286276,0.001218625,0.8613426,0.0002559444,0.0001540571,0.009512018,0.05639569,0.002666597,0.0603649,0.002565448,0.005391804,0.00008944645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986554,0.0001619812,0.0003718206,0.00003602919,0.000003036592,0.000001831209,0.00001044214,0.00001247475,0.0007469303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998561,0.0002353643,0.0005464953,0.00002733925,0.000003217751,0.00000601669,0.0000265825,0.00001358826,0.0005804026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002010076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003999889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04360041552426325,"score_gpt":0.3122588864911976,"score_spread":0.2686584709669343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}