{"id":"W2547471868","doi":"10.1111/cdev.12656","title":"Out of Reach, Out of Mind? Infants’ Comprehension of References to Hidden Inaccessible Objects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child Development","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object permanence; Referent; Psychology; Object (grammar); Comprehension; Container (type theory); Cognitive psychology; Theory of mind; Communication; Developmental psychology; Cognitive development; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003674428,0.0002371346,0.0005733652,0.0002890058,0.00006431276,0.000006595516,0.000406647,0.000125588,0.0007816397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001112439,0.00016252,0.00007745355,0.0002038307,0.00010294,0.00006064614,0.00026405,0.0001194989,0.0002657679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005809722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002001918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003140705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005604031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977679,0.0000878557,0.0009222223,0.000465198,0.0004305279,0.0003262661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986661,0.0001409865,0.0004649349,0.000405266,0.0001955834,0.0001271462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009716669,0.001045563,0.4075629,0.0003255722,0.0005962033,0.00001567751,0.07924444,0.000002058688,0.06117055,0.002405999,0.005681297,0.4409781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008870913,0.0001684853,0.882719,0.001325766,0.00001362778,0.000002552043,0.0005637709,1.289297e-7,0.08808088,0.00007435909,0.0259159,0.0002484351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508556,0.0002236574,0.0001249754,0.0003676711,0.0007469754,0.0002812149,0.00001351454,0.00002571813,0.04736074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904431,0.00002804848,0.006816721,0.0001052825,0.00005026929,0.0000163954,0.00001204921,0.0000208823,0.002507254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4751561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8558406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04360041552426325,"score_gpt":0.3122588864911976,"score_spread":0.2686584709669343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}