{"id":"W2547765132","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2009-0043","title":"POSE SELECTION FOR THE KINEMATIC CALIBRATION OF A PROTOTYPED 4 DEGREES OF FREEDOM MANIPULATOR","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Kinematics; Calibration; Parallel manipulator; Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Selection (genetic algorithm); Linkage (software); Manipulator (device); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Artificial intelligence; Control theory (sociology); Control engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Robotic arm; Robot; Physics; Statistics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002499797,0.001251776,0.0007297116,0.0010099,0.0006166109,0.0004927614,0.0006676065,0.0006725893,0.00389108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008713995,0.0004323963,0.0005091087,0.0006803374,0.0005317156,0.0006985891,0.0007862167,0.0004401481,0.0006727348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002579243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007856779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005909841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001016243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985313,0.0005803774,0.00007107173,0.0001897002,0.0005461336,0.00008139086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974559,0.001287105,0.0003030366,0.0002724333,0.0006128692,0.00006862196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001037719,0.0002892888,0.006668424,0.0004550578,0.0000692297,0.0003910462,0.0004567683,0.1903377,0.1165206,0.003948191,0.001224699,0.6786013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003212525,0.00400005,0.01694154,0.0001448278,0.0001684671,0.001673447,0.0004440233,0.787693,0.1724649,0.005948447,0.009989748,0.0002102771],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1820686,0.0002615151,0.8134969,0.00008262799,0.0000370977,0.0002165288,0.00004142638,0.0007302469,0.003065093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6828387,0.0001488494,0.3153791,0.00004085379,0.00002103887,0.000138001,0.0001321593,0.000117465,0.001183818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00389108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01322037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01211269353012035,"score_gpt":0.2005946399622414,"score_spread":0.1884819464321211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}