{"id":"W2547977518","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2011-0035","title":"KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF A TRANSLATIONAL 3-DOF TENSEGRITY MECHANISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tensegrity; Workspace; Kinematics; Statics; Mechanism (biology); Inertia; Computer science; Cartesian coordinate system; Compliant mechanism; Control theory (sociology); Geometry; Physics; Engineering; Structural engineering; Classical mechanics; Robot; Mathematics; Finite element method; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001252061,0.0001150247,0.0002800486,0.0001414634,0.00007849351,0.000005002902,0.000175212,0.0001146991,0.0001885911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001038481,0.00009733929,0.001052365,0.0008958392,0.00001971147,0.00006209876,0.000001723774,0.0001143038,1.84476e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007707123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003957783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003100341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01389795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992771,0.000005229375,0.0003094777,0.00009908854,0.0001354696,0.0001736969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999554,0.00004061265,0.00003980077,0.0001872989,0.00007721854,0.0001010267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002349455,0.000008232135,0.000007799663,0.0001124683,0.002034659,4.933393e-8,0.0004647313,0.979821,0.005927792,0.01131262,0.000008510871,0.0002997752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001327175,0.00001133366,0.0005909366,0.00001573981,0.001671844,7.050416e-7,0.0000478884,0.9804937,0.01606601,0.0008453063,0.00001708779,0.0001067186],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02564156,0.0000438827,0.9735575,0.00005130599,0.0001655451,0.0002076371,0.0002269957,0.00004913198,0.00005647824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521797,0.00001001071,0.04772834,0.00001170873,0.000008913668,0.00001835475,0.00001283842,0.00001687632,0.0000132151],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9265382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7755383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01529336866632323,"score_gpt":0.1845953258770542,"score_spread":0.169301957210731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}