{"id":"W2547977518","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2011-0035","title":"KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF A TRANSLATIONAL 3-DOF TENSEGRITY MECHANISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tensegrity; Workspace; Kinematics; Statics; Mechanism (biology); Inertia; Computer science; Cartesian coordinate system; Compliant mechanism; Control theory (sociology); Geometry; Physics; Engineering; Structural engineering; Classical mechanics; Robot; Mathematics; Finite element method; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002339575,0.0002979664,0.0002302537,0.0004032773,0.0002077052,0.0003765149,0.0004225593,0.0003580157,0.003078998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003828089,0.0001570339,0.000367079,0.0001437748,0.0005502987,0.0003298265,0.0003593784,0.0001957744,0.0003182234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001727457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002727266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006302047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000354035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999225,0.00001553724,0.000004019995,0.00001265812,0.00003417869,0.00001099385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999093,0.00002511464,0.0000337911,0.00001203016,0.00001338051,0.000006473916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002337971,0.00003686353,0.001701449,0.0001592985,0.00004062865,0.000961505,0.0002568214,0.721208,0.1240759,0.1096726,0.0003927423,0.04126037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000575526,0.0004428345,0.002092062,0.00003489554,0.00002492257,0.0003992444,0.00008055208,0.9715325,0.01001503,0.01081541,0.00446815,0.00003681245],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2566252,0.0003545436,0.7300114,0.00009386752,0.00003095263,0.00005369461,0.00006541177,0.000196273,0.0125686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722429,0.0002542118,0.02362979,0.00001448248,0.00001166605,0.00005220672,0.00004499265,0.00001590491,0.003733839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003078998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01030028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01529336866632323,"score_gpt":0.1845953258770542,"score_spread":0.169301957210731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}