{"id":"W2548486959","doi":"10.21608/jesaun.2009.127861","title":"INVESTIGATION ON DIFFERENT LATERAL EARTHQUAKE FORCE METHODS OF ANALYSIS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences/JES. Journal of engineering sciences","topic":"Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Response spectrum; Structural engineering; Seismic analysis; Modal analysis; Shear (geology); Base (topology); Modal; Earthquake simulation; Building code; Response analysis; Code (set theory); Computer science; Seismology; Geology; Engineering; Mathematics; Finite element method; Mathematical analysis; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001542126,0.0006771848,0.0003480177,0.002853846,0.0002926831,0.0006671424,0.0006630974,0.0003701324,0.003760995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004520509,0.0002145152,0.0006072315,0.0009997422,0.0003978774,0.0007144568,0.0006720255,0.0003620141,0.0006946794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005475291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004706407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002861297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998136,0.0004782383,0.00009864733,0.0001606591,0.001063613,0.000062787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972523,0.001136003,0.0002687896,0.0002069326,0.001095175,0.00004086883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003168466,0.0002048097,0.02131471,0.0005669475,0.0001189351,0.0001251708,0.0007238963,0.05679458,0.03732086,0.02802891,0.001507103,0.8529772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005261078,0.0006936339,0.03197731,0.0002433721,0.00009779152,0.0005585781,0.0006598883,0.9009048,0.03268575,0.009008504,0.02300272,0.0001150363],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1042733,0.0006972518,0.8768272,0.0001510114,0.00005355705,0.0001398188,0.0001521012,0.0004997589,0.01720602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6087334,0.0009816076,0.3797598,0.00004884248,0.00005978503,0.0003999802,0.000263717,0.0002650268,0.009487804],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003760995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01258177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02174767751864067,"score_gpt":0.2614363699806777,"score_spread":0.239688692462037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}