{"id":"W2548638829","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2016.10.018","title":"Assessing quality of life in diabetes: I. A practical guide to selecting the best instruments and using them wisely","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Context (archaeology); Quality of life (healthcare); Scale (ratio); Intervention (counseling); Selection (genetic algorithm); MEDLINE; Diabetes mellitus; Quality (philosophy); Nursing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1742812,0.0003681699,0.003633926,0.0004669325,0.0004149721,0.0005692465,0.0005037643,0.0005441812,0.00005822601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4231368,0.0002984564,0.000235575,0.0007902887,0.0005685557,0.001713151,0.0006328316,0.001836359,0.0003311499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005125202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001524938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006381807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005018268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9758166,0.0107917,0.01051809,0.001277374,0.0004630925,0.001133168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8618228,0.1301697,0.005847011,0.0009149548,0.0005199326,0.0007256822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008955927,0.001740242,0.3439597,0.03271209,0.001377924,0.000004508635,0.0005956861,0.000001001833,0.000001206395,0.0182041,0.003941052,0.5973729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001025523,0.00042314,0.003560808,0.01153898,0.0001069474,0.000004498645,0.002537003,0.0004085487,3.217949e-7,0.003223091,0.9765235,0.0006476053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1074955,0.8681002,0.00009335751,0.01865273,0.0003412717,0.002437311,0.0001715166,0.00001797238,0.002690143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006966984,0.9825103,0.006445897,0.003082414,0.0006195102,0.00018654,0.00001141033,0.0000808067,0.00009611079],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8653247271834266,"score_gpt":0.6946282808521176,"score_spread":0.170696446331309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}