{"id":"W2548830788","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2016.10.005","title":"A techno-economic assessment of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) production facilities in Western Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Innovates; Cenovus Energy","keywords":"Liquefied natural gas; Natural gas; Capital cost; Context (archaeology); Total cost; Engineering; Environmental science; Waste management; Cost database; Liquefaction; Natural-gas processing; Cost estimate; Production (economics); Business; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000330187,0.0002191323,0.0002784611,0.0001873853,0.0001864574,0.00003880948,0.0005383153,0.000186947,0.00001955551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002844902,0.0001373575,0.00005531413,0.0003776397,0.0004129713,0.0002734521,0.0007382511,0.0002351586,1.704983e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001377673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001264397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6346043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6105987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980965,0.00009650024,0.0003643094,0.0004486313,0.0003136976,0.000680391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989444,0.00009062781,0.0001354045,0.0006327703,0.0001632301,0.00003356608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005629766,0.00007220903,0.04250381,0.0001842564,0.00006208201,0.00003566286,0.00002439532,0.001815134,0.0005311121,0.8235338,0.000211382,0.1309698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003282168,0.0006423027,0.055232,0.0004641735,0.00004468696,0.00005688988,0.1076988,0.001936684,0.08049174,0.423989,0.3246719,0.00148965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884173,0.0002378741,0.00009851579,0.006183185,0.0002133604,0.0001965741,0.000009475738,0.0001500602,0.004493673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818684,0.000248772,0.00007979106,0.00002196989,0.00001306901,0.0001666649,0.000003037851,0.00001456543,0.01758368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3995448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5601277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006418047596416665,"score_gpt":0.2586251553569923,"score_spread":0.2522071077605756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}