{"id":"W2549243789","doi":"10.1038/jes.2016.60","title":"Development of a source-exposure matrix for occupational exposure assessment of electromagnetic fields in the INTEROCC study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health; National Cancer Institute; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Confidence interval; Electric field; Exposure assessment; Geometric mean; Matrix (chemical analysis); Microwave; Electromagnetic field; Physics; Environmental science; Materials science; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005752667,0.0001389539,0.0005650651,0.0003037755,0.00008418845,0.000004877536,0.0004101288,0.00007030201,0.0000883304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000799967,0.00007604032,0.0001432607,0.0001837156,0.0003881777,0.0002040774,0.00005881774,0.0002037404,0.000001121794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000211511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003622893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003214617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006052421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971815,0.0002845661,0.001513542,0.000224374,0.0004964951,0.0002994893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978229,0.0008308879,0.0009770781,0.0002319765,0.00004914562,0.00008797405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002021871,0.0006141769,0.837955,0.00001462626,0.00003529301,0.000004089208,0.001838133,0.0001033833,0.145186,0.00006756486,0.0000771001,0.01390245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002353716,0.005558272,0.9847277,0.00007527084,0.00004896989,0.0001359,0.002202757,0.0000977797,0.004143375,0.0001224788,0.0004566804,0.00007705959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883047,0.0003071186,0.009684958,0.00109826,0.000130858,0.0004290857,0.000003894406,0.000002081317,0.00003898903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861577,0.00004452316,0.01335904,0.0002909536,0.00008030583,0.00001664871,0.000001928669,0.000007300767,0.00004164035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1467727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3100834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03545642257184534,"score_gpt":0.3747388279060603,"score_spread":0.339282405334215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}