{"id":"W2549601047","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2013-0014","title":"APPLICATION OF THE TAGUCHI QUALITY METHOD TO DESIGN NAVIGATION CONSTANTS THAT ARE ROBUST TO TARGET MANEUVERS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Guidance and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Missile; Taguchi methods; Interception; Proportional navigation; Quality (philosophy); Control theory (sociology); Constant (computer programming); Computer science; Noise (video); Control (management); Simulation; Engineering; Aerospace engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003070035,0.0007933321,0.0005929287,0.0007295419,0.0002387982,0.001066773,0.0007811736,0.0006365621,0.0005114877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005338296,0.000480043,0.0005461567,0.0006242002,0.0008260509,0.0007124147,0.0003959134,0.0008417114,0.0001638166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001010654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00137768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001834618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00148184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981787,0.0003893103,0.0001017996,0.0002368085,0.001021262,0.00007195763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978209,0.0009340903,0.0004346812,0.0001744319,0.0006032931,0.00003262777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002170164,0.000155371,0.00174865,0.0006300622,0.000112263,0.00009903146,0.0002366348,0.4508694,0.3030165,0.02816431,0.0004193996,0.2143313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054608,0.0008535334,0.0008003978,0.00002541558,0.00007335252,0.00009496949,0.00002945673,0.9333732,0.05706809,0.004019276,0.003562766,0.000044886],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006190814,0.0001718822,0.9931666,0.00001822869,0.0000129298,0.00002874673,0.000003380769,0.00005645152,0.0003509448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4833183,0.0004589054,0.5151321,0.00008509841,0.00002280014,0.0001910389,0.00002679232,0.00006015763,0.0007048508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003070035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01623613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02295109215960681,"score_gpt":0.2303055998509554,"score_spread":0.2073545076913486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}