{"id":"W2549626564","doi":"10.1080/00450618.2016.1229816","title":"Expressing the value of forensic science in policing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Scope (computer science); Criminal justice; Value (mathematics); Economic Justice; Object (grammar); Engineering ethics; Criminal investigation; Forensic science; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Criminology; Data science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Geography; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001875786,0.00008695972,0.0001643876,0.0001976731,0.0002409756,0.00003458868,0.0008119092,0.00003107929,0.0002408777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000401129,0.00004154017,0.00007064048,0.0009456566,0.006385356,0.0008059658,0.00009451657,0.00009831812,0.00001143978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006895388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001150636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003133414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001341101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984028,0.00007422335,0.0004437149,0.0001647306,0.0006025726,0.0003120065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991108,0.0001915837,0.0004195421,0.0001553583,0.00004498741,0.00007772784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001477655,0.00002471505,0.8573309,0.000002364277,0.000005965294,0.000009826116,0.001124152,0.0009037948,0.100902,0.001933705,0.001994201,0.0357537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002956594,0.0001567173,0.8447509,0.0001918458,0.00001810753,0.0001174806,0.001434942,0.00007871183,0.1455731,0.00704307,0.0002421888,0.00009724602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895868,0.00001688622,0.0001327374,0.008926926,0.0002231004,0.0000389686,5.49859e-7,0.000002897983,0.001071152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969534,0.00001110555,0.00248195,0.0003429634,0.00003297106,4.386301e-7,1.857779e-8,0.000002292643,0.000174915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04467112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07060996152713937,"score_gpt":0.3216149938463252,"score_spread":0.2510050323191858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}