{"id":"W2549956709","doi":"10.1111/jeb.13017","title":"Can alternative mating tactics facilitate introgression across a hybrid zone by circumventing female choice?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Introgression; Biology; Reproductive isolation; Mating; Mate choice; Mating preferences; Hybrid zone; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Context (archaeology); Sexual selection; Population; Hybrid; Zoology; Genetic variation; Gene flow; Genetics; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004506473,0.0002834817,0.0002817503,0.0005817689,0.0003369398,0.0006441962,0.0004944163,0.0004548574,0.002551172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006704083,0.0001864407,0.0001877611,0.0002116976,0.000653491,0.0006291835,0.0004932102,0.000262559,0.0003282956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001410487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005758003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001678303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997298,0.00006892995,0.00001274857,0.00008140846,0.00004170662,0.0000653533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994751,0.0001072948,0.0002279832,0.00005844715,0.00004124934,0.00009000684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003190389,0.0001695258,0.6295137,0.0001755183,0.0001661736,0.001359368,0.00160501,0.0002157482,0.3330757,0.001816724,0.0002023007,0.03138111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005955917,0.0001780074,0.9933946,0.000009922624,0.00002725145,0.0007263176,0.0005828069,0.0003582591,0.003533961,0.0003650777,0.0008065494,0.000011269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982395,0.0002615541,0.0003504208,0.00007263793,0.000003215452,0.000003598996,0.00001950762,0.000008513475,0.001041052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999217,0.00009461433,0.0002637669,0.00003285359,0.000006238159,0.000003218373,0.0000257754,0.000002907239,0.0003535543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002551172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008534491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05047143740499178,"score_gpt":0.2691236817686926,"score_spread":0.2186522443637008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}