{"id":"W2550126077","doi":"10.1111/ibi.12442","title":"Assessing the spatial ecology and resource use of a mobile and endangered species in an urbanized landscape using satellite telemetry and DNA faecal metabarcoding","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ibis","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"University of Western Australia","keywords":"Ecology; Endangered species; Foraging; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Environmental DNA; Spatial ecology; Population; Telemetry; Biology; Habitat; Biodiversity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002246586,0.000105185,0.0001759304,0.00003942392,0.0001298703,0.00004590289,0.00006769745,0.00004619272,0.00009787052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004546107,0.00006725926,0.00001500419,0.00007045842,0.0006819475,0.0003776482,0.0004284045,0.00005502484,0.000001931124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005435955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001199758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002686428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003724604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991839,0.0001198275,0.0001442116,0.000256799,0.0001243007,0.0001709434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994876,0.0002761922,0.00007225009,0.0001165913,0.000001897889,0.00004547809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001494986,0.00001838132,0.8512414,0.000004158184,0.000008062158,0.000005092393,0.001045263,0.000004603052,0.1375134,0.000001594294,0.00001157665,0.01013149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004247827,0.0000665206,0.9909114,0.00001458096,0.00002351975,0.00001025418,0.001144583,0.0001295058,0.005785312,0.00001533116,0.001379352,0.00009480506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993218,0.0002891183,0.00002987014,0.00009026386,0.00001944283,0.0001484326,0.00001759188,0.000006981026,0.00007649873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969259,0.0002532801,0.002711677,0.00004723809,0.0000119889,0.000002296803,9.563572e-7,0.000005926741,0.00004073956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.13967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2742753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04068023744800939,"score_gpt":0.2528405557556379,"score_spread":0.2121603183076285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}