{"id":"W2550126077","doi":"10.1111/ibi.12442","title":"Assessing the spatial ecology and resource use of a mobile and endangered species in an urbanized landscape using satellite telemetry and DNA faecal metabarcoding","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ibis","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"University of Western Australia","keywords":"Ecology; Endangered species; Foraging; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Environmental DNA; Spatial ecology; Population; Telemetry; Biology; Habitat; Biodiversity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003187633,0.0001583773,0.000133436,0.001081671,0.0002527061,0.0003485742,0.0001980159,0.0001735165,0.0004580377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007742008,0.0001203162,0.0001093381,0.0006148806,0.0003682507,0.0003764733,0.0003919127,0.0001126876,0.00008667122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001634127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009693258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007022035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03265021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998191,0.00005694178,0.00001290246,0.0000506813,0.00003625676,0.00002420406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991331,0.0001745123,0.0004854934,0.00004827484,0.00009306728,0.0000656308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004696829,0.00002154002,0.9825923,0.00001868597,0.00002766664,0.00008085874,0.0004039286,0.0004376853,0.008786748,0.00002281226,0.0000258874,0.007534931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.301492e-7,0.000054103,0.9980939,0.000005000001,0.000008362891,0.0000995301,0.0005263466,0.0007205606,0.0004093283,0.00001506912,0.00006405569,0.000002988833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996579,0.00002401765,0.0001778724,0.000004903417,2.25918e-7,0.000001989997,0.00003015164,0.000001763613,0.0001011323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987323,0.00005205171,0.001052983,0.000005516082,0.000001178634,0.000004352056,0.00007271816,0.000001050441,0.00007784589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007022035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01396233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04068023744800939,"score_gpt":0.2528405557556379,"score_spread":0.2121603183076285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}