{"id":"W2550283092","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.53.25","title":"Testing the Themes in the New Brunswick Voting Behaviour Literature: An Analysis of the 2014 Provincial Election Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Underpinning; Logistic regression; Political science; General election; Voting behavior; Survey data collection; Block (permutation group theory); Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Statistics; Law; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001491443,0.00006042265,0.0001402965,0.0003319838,0.0002683248,0.0000875859,0.0004677239,0.00002681236,0.000009086943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001652776,0.00002432509,0.000088418,0.0009068407,0.0001019019,0.0002019427,0.00001582548,0.0001188599,5.543386e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002765711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008189295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6208153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9830152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998314,0.0005177543,0.0003615282,0.00006992111,0.0005681366,0.0001686866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998282,0.0005072776,0.0003054947,0.00007376685,0.0007632322,0.00006818822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008853021,0.00003446325,0.9623851,7.106229e-7,0.0003170428,0.000005442363,0.02461809,0.0000405212,0.00005404053,0.008898201,0.000654588,0.002982961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001345453,0.00008206035,0.9909376,0.00006025452,0.0001690845,0.000002918968,0.007144006,0.00001480582,0.00001972189,0.0006181638,0.0007779471,0.00003892114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796872,0.0002656188,0.00001119434,0.01918988,0.0004362232,0.0001541523,0.000004633515,0.000001970661,0.0002490974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989192,0.000008907874,0.000007710968,0.0001855378,0.0007492154,0.000002420041,2.004844e-7,0.000002752213,0.0001240737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3621999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3817097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06278960947910896,"score_gpt":0.37543812377343,"score_spread":0.3126485142943211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}