{"id":"W2550913206","doi":"10.3130/aija.70.141_4","title":"THE CHARACTERISTIC OF THE REFERENCES OF UNIVERSITY CAMPUS MASTER PLANS IN THE U.S., CANADA AND AUSTRALIA : A study on university campus master plan Part 2","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)","topic":"Urban and spatial planning","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Master plan; Plan (archaeology); Unit (ring theory); Space (punctuation); Library science; Expression (computer science); University campus; Geography; Archaeology; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics education; Engineering management; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001690733,0.0001211031,0.000178016,0.003548363,0.003242343,0.002006638,0.0006822444,0.0003808049,0.003315667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01506762,0.0002124793,0.0001284213,0.006808812,0.001619559,0.001182893,0.001545159,0.0004869532,0.0002601629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007081808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008869104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6530472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7753147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982733,0.0003539101,0.00006906992,0.0001023548,0.0009227222,0.0002786828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99204,0.0013618,0.001463635,0.0002878795,0.004241601,0.0006050911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008114122,0.00006933336,0.4131132,0.0001427679,0.00001699969,0.000896404,0.4852082,0.0002981506,0.001276177,0.01024482,0.003790141,0.08486267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000193232,0.00003678136,0.7331093,0.0001484821,0.000008617545,0.0002948069,0.2171036,0.0002841529,0.000482896,0.000333132,0.04816942,0.00002688835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884216,0.0001864108,0.0001664668,0.0002337962,0.000005168098,0.00002242865,0.0001368635,0.000004471072,0.01082274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951733,0.0002712252,0.0002231757,0.00004159877,0.000003083307,0.00001834292,0.0001577608,0.000005978623,0.004105547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6979921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02138921915697211,"score_gpt":0.2025935362829811,"score_spread":0.181204317126009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}