{"id":"W2550913206","doi":"10.3130/aija.70.141_4","title":"THE CHARACTERISTIC OF THE REFERENCES OF UNIVERSITY CAMPUS MASTER PLANS IN THE U.S., CANADA AND AUSTRALIA : A study on university campus master plan Part 2","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)","topic":"Urban and spatial planning","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Master plan; Plan (archaeology); Unit (ring theory); Space (punctuation); Library science; Expression (computer science); University campus; Geography; Archaeology; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics education; Engineering management; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002863763,0.00008410295,0.000150874,0.00004948537,0.0001647906,0.000008818063,0.0002347897,0.00003264693,0.00003157917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001075079,0.00004517359,0.00003516858,0.0001128309,0.0001574319,0.0000622853,0.00001464587,0.0003310535,1.4334e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003350953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003666563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02608793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1260156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992067,0.0001745553,0.0001949409,0.00007963378,0.0002375355,0.0001065955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993095,0.0002868689,0.0002477692,0.0001061695,0.00001127773,0.0000384512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009896662,0.000140551,0.95474,0.00001984386,0.0001061315,0.00008489875,0.02143728,0.01810926,0.0006555394,0.000005191409,0.0004783441,0.003233249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004227395,0.0003016391,0.9857044,0.00009145044,0.00006932089,0.00007929284,0.009874376,0.00004761578,0.00007873394,0.000009073104,0.003260294,0.00006107183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989191,0.00001518552,0.0001817285,0.0004547302,0.00007583242,0.00008876801,0.00005140264,8.20017e-7,0.0002124084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996223,0.000009202288,0.00004952131,0.0000224908,0.00001764328,6.328649e-8,5.496438e-7,0.000001954533,0.0002762084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09992772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02138921915697211,"score_gpt":0.2025935362829811,"score_spread":0.181204317126009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}